How we write.
CyberX does intelligence with AI. It would be incoherent if our own portal were written any other way.
Method
Every article follows the same method we apply to investigation: an analyst sets the angle and decides what can and cannot be said, the drafting is done with AI models operated by our team, and the result comes back for human review, line by line.
Nothing confidential enters this process. Articles are written from public material — court decisions, official acts, third-party reports, blockchain records. Client data and case material never pass through any of the tools used here.
What AI speeds up is the work. The judgment stays ours.
Legal review
When an article deals with civil or criminal liability, case law, public authority, or an identifiable person, it goes through legal review before publication — by a criminal lawyer.
Limits
We write about what can be said in public: fraud and scam typologies, digital threats, on-chain tracing, and regulation. Never about a case we work on, clients, matters under judicial secrecy, or operational detail that would compromise an investigation — ours or anyone else's. A third party's case enters through the public official act.
Images
Covers are AI-generated and carry the CyberX watermark. The people depicted do not exist, and resemblance to a real public figure is blocked before publication.
Corrections
A factual error is corrected in the text itself, with a dated note stating what changed. We do not delete silently.
Nothing leaves here without someone answering for what is written. That responsibility is CyberX's.